Agreement Online Form Filling Co In


Dear sir, I have a job offer from a fake form filling site called Eva Technologies. they didn`t have a business website and asked me to enter forms into leads4ff.us. They used Gmail identifiers for all communications. The agreement was that if I did not submit the work, I would have to pay RS.4600 as a maintenance fee for the company. The work I was given seemed pretty simple and it offered a nice amount of RS. 25, 000 in 10 days. So I confidently committed that I couldn`t fail. But 2 days before filing, they disabled my ID, so I couldn`t finish my work. I received legal information today saying I had to pay RS. If not, I will be summoned. I`m sure the business is wrong. I`ll send you the details of the contract and you can evaluate them yourself. Am I responsible for legal action? 1.

The 2nd part accepts that the 1st part has agreed to fill the form to the 2nd part on an intermediate order of 01 factory piece will be executed by him on 07/01/2015, which is to be started on 07/01/2015. The counting of the first part under conditions set and agreed between the two parties. Sir, you can complain to the cyber-police and receive a response to the legal reference in question, otherwise you risk receiving an ex-Parte decree against you. Please consult me in person. Les autres précautions à suivre à l`avenir, sont: =========== ============================================ ================================= == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == = = = = = == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == ===================== ==================== == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == == = = == = = = = == = == == = Voici comment vous ne suivez pas la justice inutile pour les fournisseurs en ligne qui ne fournissent pas les biens et services promis. Chitra Vittal of Bangalore wins an out-of-court settlement from the online cake supplier Far too many of us have felt betrayed by online suppliers, but have dropped it due to the apparent loss of struggle for our rights. However, Chitra Vittal`s story tells us that it is indeed possible to obtain extrajudicial comparisons with online providers with the help of consumer rights organizations such as the International Consumer Rights Protection Council (ICRPC). Chitra Vittal of Bangalore has ordered a combo pack with cakes from Flowers n Cakes in India, an online flower and gift shop that always guarantees same-day delivery and delivery of fresh produce. Flowers n Cakes to India did not deliver the product on the day indicated, and when they finally delivered it the next day, the cake was broken, made of cheap wine and of a quality totally unacceptable to the customer. In trying to complain about the product not being delivered on the scheduled day, Ms.

Vittal found that the customer service numbers posted on the site had not been accessed. It was able to find the contact information of its Hyderabad-based sub-supplier to find out that they had not received their orders until the morning after Flowers n Cakes was scheduled to receive their orders for India. Five days later, Ms. Vittal complained about the late delivery of a poor quality product through a conversation with the company`s representative, Rahul, who she said was rude and did not give consideration to her complaints. Ms Vittal then turned to Arun Saxena, President of ICRPC, which runs a helpline for consumers. Mr. Saxena, on behalf of Ms. Vittal, sent an e-mail to the seller informing him that they had engaged in unfair business practices pursuant to Section 2 (1) r) of the Consumer Protection Act. According to Mr.

Saxena, if the seller does not repay the entire sum to Ms. Vittal and compensates 50.00

Pin It