Discourse Analysis Agreement

In Europe, Michel Foucault became one of the leading theorists of the subject, especially of discourse, and wrote the archaeology of knowledge. In this context, the term “speech” no longer refers to formal linguistic aspects, but to institutionalized models of knowledge that manifest themselves in disciplinary structures and act by the association of knowledge and power. Since the 1970s, Foucault`s work has mainly influenced the analysis of discourse in the social sciences. Thus, in modern European social sciences, there is a wide range of approaches that work with the definition of Foucault`s discourse and its theoretical concepts. In addition to the original context in France, a wide-open discussion has been held since 2005 on the analysis of the discourse of the social sciences in Germany. It was here, for example, that sociologist Reiner Keller developed his widely recognized “sociologist of knowledge approach to discourse” (SKAD). [14] According to the sociology of knowledge of Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann, Keller asserts that our sense of reality in everyday life and thus the meaning of each object, action and event are the product of a permanent and routine interaction. In this context, SKAD has been developed as a scientific perspective capable of understanding the processes of “The Social Construction of Reality” at all levels of social life, combining the theories of discourse and power mentioned above by Michel Foucault, while introducing Berger/Luckmann`s theory of knowledge. While the latter focus mainly on the constitution and stabilization of knowledge at the level of interaction, Foucault`s perspective focuses on the institutional contexts of the production and integration of knowledge, where the subject seems primarily determined by knowledge and power. This is why the [15]”Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Knowledge Approach to Discourse” can also be seen as an approach to dealing with the problem of micromacros in sociology, which has been the subject of heated debate. [Citation required] One problem for the speech analyst is deciding when a particular feature is relevant to the required specification. One question many linguists ask themselves is: “Are there general principles that determine the relevance or nature of the specifications? [19] [Quote needed] GivĂ©n, Talmy.

Pin It